Thursday, November 30, 2006

New blog link

I have now added a link to Greg Mankiw's blog. He is a new economic adviser for Mitt Romney's PAC, and his blog has some interesting stuff. Like this poll on what economists think about various issues.

I am sure my 2 readers will rejoice in this information.

Hey New Yorkers

I love NYC. But this is ridiculous. New Yorkers, if you don't want trans-fats, just eat someplace healthy! No one is forcing you to go to Burger King.

Wednesday, November 29, 2006

More Friedman-esque stuff

Is Corporate Social Responsibility "bunk?"

Sunday, November 26, 2006

A Sporting Chance

Today, whilst eating my lunch, I was watching the documentary "Fog of War" on the History Channel. "Fog of War" is a fantastic documentary exploring the life of Robert McNamara, former Secy of Defense during Vietnam. He is a fascinating figure to me, as a man who played a substantial role not only in the destruction of lives through war, but also in saving lives through his work in the area of auto safety. What a sad dichotomy. I highly recommend it to any of you who have never seen it.

Anyways, during the commercial, however, I changed the channel and found the sport of Curling on NBC. Naturally, I was thrilled (I mean, who wouldn't be?) After all, I still regret not going to watch the curling competition at the 2002 Olympics in Salt Lake City. I had almost bought tickets, but decided not to (it was one of the few events that I could conceivably afford tickets to as a poor student).

I think that Curling should be my new favorite sport. Not as a matter of sheer enjoyment, but as a matter of practicality. Why? Because I'm in my late-20s, and it is really the only sport I can think of where a 20-something like me could still conceivably, one day, just up and decide to be an Olympian.

That is not to take anything away from these curlers. They are clearly very skilled at what they do, and it's a complex sport. But from an athletic standpoint, it doesn't seem to me to be a sport (like gymnastics or figure skating) that one needs to start by the age of 5 to excel at. Less obviously, I'm probably too old to dedicate my life to the Steeple-Chase or the Biathlon and have a legitimate shot.

But with curling....it seems that I could wake up tomorrow morning with the Olympic fire burning inside of me, and dedicate the rest of my life to the sport of curling, and conceivably compete for my beloved US of A in the Games of the Winter Olympiad.

Saturday, November 25, 2006

The Big Finish

What an unbelievable finish to an intense game!



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DR4LUpSVO4A

Friday, November 24, 2006

Un-Holy War?

Gordon Monson's take on the "Holy War"

Wednesday, November 22, 2006

Who represents the people?

I love this exchange between Mitt & a reporter with delusions of grandeur (watch until the very end):

BYU: Conference Champs

At Garn Video Productions, you can find this highliight video of the New Mexico game.

Tuesday, November 21, 2006

Lost After Translation

This op-ed from the NYT is terribly sad and poignant.

By BASIM MARDAN
Published: November 20, 2006
THE United States Marines entered Mosul from the north. I lived in the northern suburbs, so I saw the first American flag. When the Humvees stopped, I shook hands with the marines, and I told them: “You are mostly welcome here. Why don’t you come to my house and drink some cold water?” They offered me a job.

I was the first or second translator to work with the coalition forces in my city, the first or second Iraqi to set foot on the American base in Mosul. The Marines paid me $150 a month, which was better than the $2 I was making as a librarian. So I didn’t see weapons in their hands, I saw flowers, and I took them all as friends. I loved what I was doing because I thought it was a good thing for my country.

My family was nervous. They told me things would change. I needed the American money to get married, but my fiancée said, “We don’t need to get married now — just quit.” But I wanted to work with the military forever; I loved it.

The unit I worked with was training and equipping the Iraqi police, teaching them about human rights. I translated textbooks from an American police academy into Arabic. The Americans taught Iraqi officials to exercise their authority without taking bribes or humiliating employees.

Iraqis needed this education, and the unit I worked with was awesome. At one point, they did two or three patrols to clean up garbage from the streets. In our culture, cleaning garbage is a low-level job, but when we saw a captain and a general doing it, that gave us a very great feeling. I threw away my helmet, took a shovel and started working, cleaning up garbage.

But even as we cleaned the city of garbage, we forgot another kind of garbage that was accumulating. The way the Army reacted to the insurgency was not perfect. The Americans did many foolish things. When I saw the pictures from Abu Ghraib, I thought, we are teaching Iraqi policemen not to do that — do the Americans really do that?

I grew sad, and I didn’t know what to believe, because the people I worked with were great. I’d told the officers at our camp’s detention center, “You are treating those prisoners better than their own mothers.” It’s not normal in our culture for a policeman to come and feed a sick prisoner who is so dangerous that you have to keep him chained.

But I did it myself. I was very kind to Iraqi people, to my own people, and I think Americans taught me that — the American Army that I was working with, not the American Army that was in Abu Ghraib.

In the second year, when we were processing the release of prisoners from Abu Ghraib, I read out a list of names of prisoners who needed to collect their documents. One of them said to me, “You are all going to be killed.” I thought he was referring to the Americans, until he said, “No, I mean you.”

I didn’t translate this for the soldiers who were with me. I was thinking, “This person just got out of prison, and I don’t want to be the reason that he goes back to prison.”

About a month later, a message was fixed to my door, full of verses from the Koran and threats and curses. They gave me about one week to quit what I was doing.

A week later, a CD was fixed on my door, picturing one of my best friends, Nabi Abul-Ahad. It was a video of them beheading him, with the message that I would be next.

I was kicked out of the house. My family didn’t want me there any more. They said, “You’re going to get us all killed.” I had to leave my wife, who was pregnant. Baghdad was a real hell, so I hid in Najjaf.

After my wife gave birth to our son, her father told her, “If your husband doesn’t come to Mosul now, even if he’s going to get killed, then you are not his wife anymore.” This can happen in our society. I didn’t want to lose my wife or my son, so I went back to Mosul.

In Mosul, I had to stay hidden. I walked for about three hours in the dark, after curfew, when anybody can shoot at you, including the Americans, just to see my wife and my newborn son. Then I went back to my family’s house and hid for three months.

The American Army, or whoever’s in charge, has badly disappointed the translators. When I told them I was under threat, they said I could come and live on the base. I told them I had just been married, and my wife was pregnant, and my family needed me. They said I could live on the base and they would drop me by my house to visit my family at night.

Imagine if somebody saw me dropped by an American convoy near my house. The house would be burning the second I was inside. These were not logical solutions.

They could have helped my family move to Kurdistan, helped find me a job with the government there. Or, if I’d escaped to Jordan, they could tell the American Embassy there: “This is a translator who has been working for the United States Army. He’s just like an American soldier. Treat him well.”

But I’m not going to be ungrateful to the people who were fighting and dying for my country. I have friends in the American Army who died in front of my eyes.

I remember one of them, a dear friend to me who died stopping a car bomb. He was a hero. He was guarding the police academy in Mosul, which was full of new recruits being trained by the Americans.

My heart broke when I saw this: an American, coming from another continent, who died to protect Iraqi policemen. This was a good message, and I would never say that those people exploited me or exploited my thinking.

The system did. Not them.

Basim Mardan is a poet and translator.

Thursday, November 16, 2006

Passing of a Legend

Today, renowned economist Milton Friedman died.

To celebrate his contributions, I'm posting a great video from google here. Thanks goes out to "sordomudo" for his giving me the heads-up and the link.

This video is, IMHO, particularly interesting and prescient in light of how old it is. I'm not sure on the date, but it's an old one. In it, he uses the concept of minimum wage, which I just posted on a couple days back, to illustrate where good intentions are not matched by results.

One of my favorite lines comes at the beginning:
"The fact is, that the programs that are labeled as being for the poor, for the needy, almost always have effects exactly the opposite of those which their well-intentioned sponsors intend them to have."

Interestingly, he also addresses the social security tax, expounding on principles that I have talked about earlier in the context of the corporate income tax. The principle is the same: economically, the "incidence" of the tax, a.k.a. the burden, does not fall upon the corporation, but rather on the employee (or the consumer). Notably, Friedman was (in essence) arguing for the privatization of social security nearly half a century ago. The principle is simple: people know how to spend their own money better than the government does.

One weakness in his argument, IMHO, comes as he extols the virtues of the 19th century without decrying some of its more obvious shortcomings. I think he is a bit too dismissive in regards to the social and economic exigencies that led some Americans to embrace collectivism. I think he also ignores those who were religiously motivated to establish Utopian Collectivism (like the LDS), but that was a bit outside the scope of the discussion.

However, in the end, his point about fighting the natural progress toward tyranny and the "drift toward collectivism" is interesting. He points out that when a problem is identified in society, the argument for government action is simple, and easy for everyone to understand; thus resulting in a call for more collectivist policies. Meanwhile, the argument for the natural and positive results of market operations is subtle and difficult to grasp. Further, it's easy to characterize such nuanced arguments as selfish and greedy. This has always been my frustration as well. Any time you argue for the market, it's characterized as being selfish and unresponsive.

Warning: Friedman uses outdated and politically-incorrect language in a couple of instances.

Tuesday, November 14, 2006

Minimum Wage

The WSJ argues that raising the minimum wage is a bad idea.

Saturday, November 11, 2006

Ask a Ninja: Pirates

I realize it's late in the game, but this review of Pirates 2 is hilarious.

Friday, November 10, 2006

True Heroes

A returning soldier discusses his experience with the War. I have doubts as to whether his experience is at all typical, but it's nice to read something positive.

BYU drive chart

The drive chart from last night's game at LES.

Forgetting Conservatism: Why the GOP lost

The following articles discuss the GOP's midterm defeat.
George Will argues that the GOP were punished for forgetting conservatism. He contends they are "guilty of apostasy from conservative principles at home (frugality, limited government) and embrace of anti-conservative principles abroad (nation-building grandiosity pursued incompetently)."

And then there is Dick Armey's take, and what Provociferous blog would be fully complete without Mitt Romney's take?


To me, it seems that Conservatives are not content to "just hold seats" as the lesser of two evils. Crazy spending so that Republicans can be 'conservative' on other issues just doesn't fire up the base in a midterm election that has been nationalized to this extent. The GOP had already lost plenty of independents due to "Bush fatigue" but had to go and alienate many in their principled conservative base as well.

Bush and the congressional GOP got 1/2 of the conservative equation correct: They cut taxes. That those taxes work is evidenced by the steady increase in our actual tax revenues. (Yes, I know it's a "crazy" principle: cut taxes and make more money!! The thing is, it is proven to work.) Yet, Congress missed the other half of the conservative equation: restrained spending. Combining the worst of liberalism and the best of conservatism opened the GOP to charges of fiscal irresponsibility.

Brian Regan on the Walkie-Talkie

This guy makes me chuckle